PROVISIONAL COMPUTER-GENERATED RED LIST ASSESSMENTS OF MELIOLA
Meliola brachyodonta
Assessment


Assessment   Distribution map   Evidence   Guide

Scientific name

Meliola brachyodonta Syd. [IndexFungorum. Petrak's Lists 3: ?; 5: 231]

Synonyms

None noted.

Vernacular names

None known.

Taxonomic position

Meliolaceae, Meliolales, Sordariomycetes, Ascomycota, Fungi.

Red List assessment

Data Deficient [probably Vulnerable] [IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: version 3.1. Level: global].

Rationale

This evaluation is based on 46 records [breakdown: Cybernome (1 record); IndexFungorum (1 record); other catalogues (2 records)]. There are 24 records with dates, the earliest 1909 (the species was first described in 1928), the most recent 2012. Of dated records, 8% are post 1960. This species is recorded from 8 countries distributed through 4 continents and regions. This fungus is known to occur in association with 14 other species belonging in 6 genera.

This species is widely distributed and associated with more than one other genus. Only a small proportion of dated collections were made after 1960, suggesting that this species will probably eventually be evaluated as 'Vulnerable'.

Reasons for change from previous assessment

None: not previously assessed.

Date of assessment

29 November 2025.

Name/s of the assessor/s

D.W. Minter

Text documentation

Taxonomy. No comment.

Geographical distribution. Australia (New South Wales); Brazil (Espirito Santo, Pernambuco); China; Sierra Leone; South Africa; Taiwan; Uganda (Central); Venezuela (Distrito Federal).

IUCN area statistics [km²] AOO EOO
Pre-1961 44 54,417,133
1961-2000 4 insufficient data
Post-2000 4 insufficient data

Associated organisms and substrata [IUCN Red List status, if known]. Plantae (part): Anacardium occidentale L. [LC] (leaf); Astronium fraxinifolium Schott; Croton curranus Blake (leaf); Euroschinus falcata (leaf); Hymenocardia heudelotii Planch. ex Müll. Arg.; Rhus chinensis var. roxburghii (DC.) Rehder; Rhus incana Mill.; Rhus javanica var. roxburghii (DC.) D. Chandra; Rhus tomentosa L. [LC] (leaf); Rhus villosa L. f.

Habitat and ecology.

Threats. Climate change. Not known. Habitat destruction. Not known. Persecution. Not known. Pollution. Not known.

Population. Not known. With no direct information, observation frequency over time, if available, can be considered as a proxy to infer current population trend; for species associated with trees, loss of woodland cover over time is another possible proxy. Observation frequency over time. The species was first described in 1928. There are 24 datable records of this species. The earliest is 1909 and the most recent is 2012. The profile of dated records is: pre-1961 (22); 1961-2000 (1); post-2000 (1); Observations have declined sharply. Loss of tree cover over time. This species occurs associated with trees in the following countries (percentage loss of tree cover between 2001 and 2024 in brackets): Brazil (14%); Sierra Leone (39%) [figures from 'Forest change' tab of Global Forest Watch]. Current trend (inferred). Long-term steep decline possibly driven by habitat destruction. The small number of datable records makes this inference very uncertain.

Conservation actions (in situ). None known.

Conservation actions (ex situ). Culture collections. Straininfo: check current status. Genome banks. European Nucleotide Archive: check current status; NCBI: check current status.

Economic impacts (positive). Bioremediation. None known. Biotechnology. None known. Cultural. None known. Ecosystem services. None known. Feed (animals). None known. Food (human). None known. Medical/veterinary. None known.

Economic impacts (negative). Biodeterioration. None known. Disease. None known. Invasiveness. None known.